Now and Then
On April 28, 2006, I participated in the centennial celebration of the Azusa Street Revival. I was awe struck by the knowledge that the explosive growth of this movement was neither planned nor calculated. It was not haphazard, but a sovereign move of God taking place in His time and on His terms.
It began on April 14, 1906, in a small, wood frame house at 214 North Bonnie Brae Street in Los Angeles, CA. Richard and Ruth Asberry invited evangelist William J. Seymour to conduct preaching and prayer meetings in their home. With a small band of multi-ethnic believers assembled, they prayed until the Holy Ghost fell. This mighty band of prayer warriors gladly shouldered the rejection of their community, friends, and churches, in exchange for the approval of God.
After the tour, I walked away from Bonnie Brae Street with a profound sense of the sovereignty of God and the importance of intercessory prayer. Since then, I have often rehearsed my initial experience, and each time, I am left with the same conclusion. Knowing God in the power of the Holy Ghost is the greatest privilege of my life, for knowing God’s power is what makes me truly alive.
Something Old Something New
This brings me to the current buzz over the emergent church debate. Over the last four years, I have observed intently as emergent theology and postmodern ideology has gained acceptance within enclaves of the oneness Pentecostal movement.
[1]Andrew Perriman of open source theology defines one aspect of emergent theology, “A theology that is broadly but not slavishly postmodern in its epistemology, wary of absolute formulations, tolerant of diversity and plurality, sensitive to the social manipulation of texts.”
As you can see, this theology affects everything from Soteriology to organizational structure and everything in between. I have witnessed the effects of this ideology on young and old alike. Many are taken aback and confused, blown to and fro like tree branches in a summer storm. And then there are others, those who scurry about trying to gain perspective, but seem overwhelmed by the speed and voracity, in which this theology/philosophy has over taken preacher and church alike. Some well known, others unknown, yet all seem to have shed at least a portion, if not most of classical oneness Pentecostal theology. All for relevancy in the modern world, but to what end?
I recently came across a profound description of postmodern philosophy in the [2] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: That postmodernism is indefinable is a truism. However, it can be described as a set of critical, strategic and rhetorical practices employing concepts such as difference, repetition, the trace, the simulacrum, and hyper-reality to destabilize other concepts such as presence, identity, historical progress, epistemic certainty, and the univocity of meaning.
When encountering theological controversies one must ask, “Is it within the scope of scriptural hermeneutics? Will it be profitable to the manifested Church? Will it increase the effectiveness and health of the body of Christ?”
It is important that we thoroughly explore the scripture, in order to gain proper perspective, when approaching questions concerning Church doctrine. The absolute worst thing we could do is to respond out of emotion or even tradition. We know that paradigms shift according to culture, economics, and politics. We also know the scripture is timeless, thus relevant in any culture. So then, the basis of any question regarding the church and it function, must be addressed judiciously and from a well founded scriptural viewpoint.
Need of the Hour
I propose that the Church is in need of “Son’s of Issachar.” We need men that have an understanding of the times and know not only what should be done, but also, how to accomplish the desired result.
Permit me to explain. Doctrinal questions, such as emergent theology with its far reaching implications, need to be looked at with a great deal of scrutiny. I have lifted a text from 1 Chronicles that deals with establishing David’s throne in Hebron. I would like to submit it as an idea, dare I say, a possible solution to the difficult questions we face today.
Biblical history shows us David understood the pitfalls of King Saul and his terrible decisions, accompanied by poor counsel. David knew he needed men who understood the spiritual, social, and political climate of Israel. He needed men whose allegiance was to the kingdom, not self promoters with political ambition. The tribe of Issachar came to Hebron and joined themselves to David because they knew that he was God’s man. “And of the children of Issachar, which were men that had understanding of the times, to know what Israel ought to do; the heads of them were two hundred; and all their brethren were at their commandment.” -1 Chronicles 12:32
Eighteenth century theologian Matthew Henry commented on this passage: [3]. “The men of Issachar were the fewest of all, only 200, and yet as serviceable to David’s interest as those that brought in the greatest numbers, these few being in effect the whole tribe. They were men of great skill above any of their neighbors, They understood the natural times, could discern the face of the sky, were weather-wise, could advise their neighbors in the proper times for plowing, sowing reaping, or the ceremonial times, the times appointed for the solemn feasts;…the political times; they understood public affairs, the temper of the nation, and the tendencies of the present events…they were greatly intent on public affairs, had good intelligence from abroad and made a good use of it… They were men of great interests; for all their brethren were at their commandment. They knew how to rule, and the rest knew how to obey. It is happy indeed when those that should lead are intelligent and judicious, and those who are to follow are modest and obsequious.”
It would behoove oneness Pentecostals to train up young men such as ben Issachar, educated, scholarly, gifted, wise, and faithful. Men called of God, grounded in scripture and prayerfully seeking only the advancement of His kingdom. We must take and stand and address any misguided or heretical teachings, with conviction and brotherly love. It is not my intent to neither throw stones nor cast aspersions.
“Cry aloud, spare not, lift up thy voice like a trumpet, and show my people their transgression, and the house of Jacob their sins.” -Isaiah 58:1
The first century Church was significant to their generation because they preached the full council of God without fear or favor. They did not preach what people wanted to hear, they preached what sinners needed to hear. What makes our day any different? Why would we want to move off of the foundation laid by the apostles and prophets, with Jesus himself as the cornerstone?
Peter did not say come join our community, Peter said, “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call… And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved”. –Acts 2:38-39,47
Paul did not say come as you are and share so that we might all learn from one another’s spiritual journey. Paul said, “For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you…And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commands all men everywhere to repent:” -Acts 17:23,30
The Church has and always will need apostolic leadership. “And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:” -Ephesians 4:11-12
Yet to Come
As we are push into the political globalization of our world, national borders will disappear, yielding to the worldwide socioeconomic system. We must be prepared, as the church, not to resist physically, but rather, to engage spiritually through intercessory prayer and preaching. Our teaching must be more than relevant talks based on pop culture references. Apostolic preaching draws the believer to a closer relationship with Jesus. Apostolic teaching illuminates the mind and provokes thought, while creating a hunger for the bread of life. We have been commissioned by Jesus to go into the entire world, “Teaching them (everyone) to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen.” -Matthew 28:20
It is in my estimation that we are living in the greatest hour of the church. I understand this statement may seem laced with hyperbole; however, we read throughout the scripture, beginning in Genesis, that God’s plan brings everything full circle and to completion. I do not believe the Church will not be rescued from a position of weakness and ruin, but rather it will rise from the fires of worldwide revival. Paul, the learned Hebrew scholar and Apostle, emphasizes this fact from his closing statement of the eschatological passage to the Corinthians.
“Therefore, my beloved brethren, be ye steadfast, unmovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labor is not in vain in the Lord.” -I. Corinthians 15:58
In order for us to stay above the fray, we must put our ideology under the scrutiny of scripture. All of us are found wanting in some area. We would do well to heed Simon Peter’s final admonishment to the dispersed church. [4] “But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever. Amen.”-2 Peter 3:18
[1] http://www.opensourcetheology.net/
[2] http://plato.stanford.edu/
[3] http://www.ccel.org/ccel/henry/mhc.i.html
[4] All scripture quotations are from the KJV
SocialVibe